What is more likely? A GM catches and bans a cheater or a GM that has some random vendetta against you
Which of the two is more likely is irrelevant. All that matters is the truth of what happened.
I'm not dim witted. Dual logging has everything to do with how you exploited the caravan.
In case you forgot (you dimwhit hahahaha), Docan also said in one of your sad sack threads you are alts.
Please provide more proof that two people are involved here.
You're even dimmer than I thought. Let me repeat myself for the 99999th time then.
In your *opinion* dual-logging had something to do with the issue. In reality, it did NOT. But let's assume it DID because you seem to find it impossible to let go of this ridiculous notion.
And yes, DocAN mentioned his opinion that the 2 chars were controlled by one person, but that was never his focus, just a sidenote of no significance. Ask him if you'd like, and he'll tell you.And now, let me explain something to you.
I know for a FACT that two different PCs & two different people were involved, because I was THERE. If there is PROOF to be provided that I'm lying, the burden of it is on the accuser, not on the defendant.
Note for the dim-witted: I'm not the one making the accusations and therefore the burden of proof is not on me.
I don't see any GMs providing any proof I was dual-logging on the same PC. Why? Because it's impossible to have such proof where none can exist. BUT ALSO because the fact I didn't dual-log on the same PC (or that I did, if I'm lying about it) has NOTHING to do with the issue and dual-logging (or lack thereof) is NOT why I was banned.
Consider the following: What if I indeed used 2 PCs, but there was only 1 person (me)? Would that change anything? Would that make me innocent (which I am btw, I didn't knowingly exploit anything). Obviously fucking NOT, so nobody cares except for one ridiculous moron, and that moron is YOU.
Sheesh.
I got BANNED for being in the same caravan as another player that HAPPENED TO BE LOW-LEVEL on a number of occasions. Why on a number of occasions? Because we were playing TOGETHER. Yes, PLAYING - NOT EXPLOITING.